https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/issue/feedOKH Journal: Anthropological Ethnography and Analysis Through the Eyes of Christian Faith2024-07-25T06:29:01-07:00Eloise Meneses, PhD, Editoremeneses@eastern.eduOpen Journal Systems<p><strong>Mission of the Journal (ISSN: 2573-4180):</strong></p> <p>The<em> On Knowing Humanity Journal</em> publishes works in cultural anthropology that are informed by Christian theology. The work is interdisciplinary, research oriented, theoretical, and scholarly. The journal is peer reviewed and open access. <em>Subscription</em><em> is encouraged and is free. </em> To subscribe, please scroll down to the bottom of this page and click on "For Readers" under "Information." </p> <p>The purpose of the <em>On Knowing Humanity Journal</em> is to promote the development of a Christian faith-based approach to anthropology. This new school of thought in Christian anthropology, parallel to Marxist or feminist anthropologies, is located within the larger discipline of anthropology. It encourages all anthropologists to incorporate insights from theology into their accounts of people and cultures, and allows religiously committed anthropologists to speak freely of the ways in which their commitments inform their theory and practice. It also raises new questions and lines of research on subjects such as: the significance of humanity's unique calling in nature for personhood and the construction of culture; the underlying reasons for humanity’s destructive behavior toward self, others, and the environment; and the role that divine redemption and hope play in human lived experience and practice. Special emphasis is placed on the reincorporation of teleology, in the sense of purpose, into scientific understanding. Through collaborative research and scholarship, the OKH Journal invites dialogue between Christian anthropologists and anthropologists of all persuasions around a deeper understanding of the human condition, and encourages the doing of anthropological research and writing “through the eyes of faith.”</p>https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/207How God Becomes Real: Kindling the Presence of Invisible Others. By Tanya Luhrmann2024-04-20T22:27:19-07:00Christopher Valenciavalencia.chris440@gmail.com2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Christopher Valenciahttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/218Crossing Cultures with the Gospel: Anthropological Wisdom for Effective Christian Witness. By Darrell L. Whiteman2024-07-24T11:27:24-07:00Robert CanfieldCANFROBT@WUSTL.EDU2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Robert Canfieldhttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/209British Social Anthropologists and Missionaries in the Twentieth Century 2024-07-24T07:55:27-07:00Timothy Larsentimothy.larsen@wheaton.edu<p>Since 1980 there has been an open discussion on the hostility that anthropologists typically have for missionaries. A consensus in this conversation has been that anthropologists dislike missionaries because they are engaged in cultural imperialism. This article, however, explores another hidden factor: the professionalization aspirations of those self-identifying with anthropology as a discipline which created a strong desire to eliminate missionaries as potential rivals. Missionaries indisputably acquired a deep knowledge of indigenous languages and cultures which made it all the more important to dismiss them as biased amateurs lest they should be accepted as competing experts. This dynamic is documented and explored across the twentieth century in the context of British social anthropologists. One particularly telling example is evolving critiques of missionaries in regards to fieldwork as the practice of anthropologists themselves changed in this regard from armchair anthropology, through survey work, to intensive participant observation.</p>2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Timothy Larsenhttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/210A Centenary Retrospective2024-07-24T08:11:21-07:00Vincent Gilvgil@vanguard.edu<p>This retrospective provides a brief history of Christian medical missions as the critical backdrop to understanding how missions in the 19<sup>th</sup> and 20<sup>th</sup> centuries paved the way for ethnographic work among non-Western culture groups, as well as provided insights into other cultures’ health and healing practices. Medical missions also brought biomedicine into the care systems of non-Western cultures and set the stage for understanding the importance of cultural knowledge in determinants of health and disease. These endeavors cannot be discounted as motivators for anthropologists to further engage the work of health and healing as these worked to understand other cultures and their needs. This retrospective also explores how the subdiscipline/specialization of medical anthropology became formalized, applied; and how critically important it became in contributing to medical knowledge and practice cross-culturally. Examples of modern-day giants of medical anthropology bring our attention forward and underscore their lasting contributions. The retrospective ends by encouraging Christian anthropologists to consider specializing in medical anthropology. For those in practice, it asks where they ‘abide’ today: where they can be located, given that there is no formal organization unique to them.</p>2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Vincent Gilhttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/211Anthropological Insights and the Early Voices of Ethnodoxology2024-07-24T08:18:29-07:00Elsen Elcio Portugalelsenpp@gmail.com<p>“Whither Bound in Missions?”— In Which Direction is the Missions Movement Going? Missiologist Daniel Fleming formalized this question in his book, <em>Whither Bound in Missions?,</em> published in 1925. This and several other publications in the early to middle of the 20<sup>th</sup> century demonstrate the engagement of the missiological community with anthropological perspectives seeking to understand and support the direction of missions for the upcoming century. In doing so, they have contributed as well to practiced anthropology through missions.</p> <p> This article explores the contributions of three authors who were learning the value of incorporating anthropological perspectives into the missionary enterprise. They were also forerunners of the discipline of ethnodoxology, encouraging the application of local music and art for the communication of the Christian faith when the topic was not yet of great concern within the broader missiological movement. They often demonstrate a perception ahead of their time, and courageously call on their constituency—and even on us in the 21st century— to learn and apply principles that can strengthen the Mission of God in the long run.</p>2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Elsen Elcio Portugalhttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/205The Christian Missionary Enterprise and Its Effects on Idemili (Igbo, Nigeria) Culture2024-03-23T04:06:54-07:00Kanayo Louis Nwadialorkl.nwadialor@unizik.edu.ngRoseline Nonye Ewelukwaewelunonye@gmail.com<p>This study examines the impact of Christian missionary enterprises on the socio-cultural settings of Idemili, Anambra State, Nigeria. The study employs qualitative research methods such as interviews, observations and literature review to collect data; a phenomenological approach is used to analyze the data. Through an analysis of primary and secondary sources, the research highlights ways in which Christian missionaries influenced the beliefs, practices, and values of the Idemili people. Through their efforts, Christianity spread, leading to the establishment of schools, hospitals, and other institutions that brought about social and economic development. However, there have also been conflicts with traditional cultural practices and divisions among family members. The findings suggest that the introduction of Christianity led to the transformation of the socio-cultural landscape of the Idemili, resulting in a blend of traditional and Christian beliefs and practices. The study concludes that while Christian missionary work has brought many positive changes to Idemmili, it is important to also preserve and respect the people’s cultural heritage.</p>2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Kanayo Louis Nwadialorhttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/212Response to Timothy Larsen’s “British Social Anthropologists and Missionaries in the Twentieth Century”2024-07-24T10:40:54-07:00Lindy Backueslbackues@eastern.edu2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Lindy Backueshttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/213The Anthropologist in the Evangelical Cinematic Gaze2024-07-24T10:46:42-07:00Naomi HaynesNaomi.Haynes@ed.ac.uk2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Naomi Hayneshttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/214Response to Timothy Larsen, “British Social Anthropologists and Missionaries in the Twentieth Century”2024-07-24T10:51:57-07:00Brian Howellbrian.howell@wheaton.edu2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Brian Howellhttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/215From Dim Past to Bright Future2024-07-24T10:57:57-07:00Derrick Lemonsdlemons@uga.edu2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Derrick Lemonshttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/216Pressures, Practicalities, and the Presence of God2024-07-24T11:04:34-07:00Jenell Parisjparis@messiah.edu2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Jenell Parishttps://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/217On Social Anthropologists and Missionary Ethnographers2024-07-24T11:11:59-07:00Dana L. Robertdrobdan@bu.edu2024-07-25T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Dana L. Robert