OKH Journal: Anthropological Ethnography and Analysis Through the Eyes of Christian Faith
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj
<p><strong>Mission of the Journal (ISSN: 2573-4180):</strong></p> <p>The<em> On Knowing Humanity Journal</em> publishes works in cultural anthropology that are informed by Christian theology. The work is interdisciplinary, research oriented, theoretical, and scholarly. The journal is peer reviewed and open access. <em>Subscription</em><em> is encouraged and is free. </em> To subscribe, please scroll down to the bottom of this page and click on "For Readers" under "Information." </p> <p>The purpose of the <em>On Knowing Humanity Journal</em> is to promote the development of a Christian faith-based approach to anthropology. This new school of thought in Christian anthropology, parallel to Marxist or feminist anthropologies, is located within the larger discipline of anthropology. It encourages all anthropologists to incorporate insights from theology into their accounts of people and cultures, and allows religiously committed anthropologists to speak freely of the ways in which their commitments inform their theory and practice. It also raises new questions and lines of research on subjects such as: the significance of humanity's unique calling in nature for personhood and the construction of culture; the underlying reasons for humanity’s destructive behavior toward self, others, and the environment; and the role that divine redemption and hope play in human lived experience and practice. Special emphasis is placed on the reincorporation of teleology, in the sense of purpose, into scientific understanding. Through collaborative research and scholarship, the OKH Journal invites dialogue between Christian anthropologists and anthropologists of all persuasions around a deeper understanding of the human condition, and encourages the doing of anthropological research and writing “through the eyes of faith.”</p>Eastern Universityen-USOKH Journal: Anthropological Ethnography and Analysis Through the Eyes of Christian Faith2573-4180<p>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</p><p> </p>1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a <a href="https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-types-examples/licensing-examples/#by">Creative Commons License Attribution CC BY</a> that allows others to to "distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon" the author's work, even commercially, as long as they share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.<br /> <br />2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.<br /><br />3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See <a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_new">The Effect of Open Access</a>).Blood Entanglements, Evangelicals and Gangs in El Salvador
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/249
Christopher Valencia
Copyright (c) 2026 Christopher Valencia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-292026-07-2910210510710.62141/okh.v10i2.249Divination, Possession, and Witchcraft
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/251
<p>As an anthropologist who is also a Christian I regularly engage with people who have religious expressions and spiritual interests that differ from my own. I have witnessed divination, sacrifices, and possession, and researched witchcraft. In principle, I do not wish to get personally involved in religious or spiritual activities that concern other entities than God, especially if it entails participating in their worship or seeking their favor. Since I found little help in the available literature, I needed to develop my own position. Taking a reflexive and experiential stance, I draw on my background, the people I engage with, and my experience of doing fieldwork. While both anthropologists and missionaries have often viewed religions other than Christianity reductively, I propose that we take people seriously by adopting an empathic attitude. This works well with an ontological, relational, and collaborative approach to anthropology that focuses on studying with people.</p>Johannes Merz
Copyright (c) 2026 Johannes Merz
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-292026-07-2910211610.62141/okh.v10i2.251The Fossett Framework
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/247
<blockquote data-start="679" data-end="1911"> <p>Identity rupture represents one of the most destabilizing experiences in human life, disrupting relational belonging, narrative coherence, embodiment, and vocational orientation. While theological anthropology has long emphasized the relational and storied nature of the human person, it has offered fewer process-oriented accounts of how identity is reconstituted following profound disruption. This article presents the Fossett Framework as a theological–anthropological model that interprets rupture as an ontological disturbance rather than as a primarily psychological or therapeutic event. Drawing on Christian anthropology alongside interdisciplinary insights from narrative and trauma studies, the Framework articulates four movements—Rupture, Descent, Turning, and Re-Formation—through which the human person undergoes reconstitution rather than recovery. Identity is understood as a dynamic process of becoming, mediated through communal belonging, relational presence, and theological meaning-making. By positioning community as a theological agent in the restoration of personhood, the Fossett Framework contributes a constructive process-oriented account of identity re-formation to contemporary debates concerning relationality, suffering, and human becoming.</p> </blockquote> <h2 data-start="1918" data-end="1933"> </h2>Douglas Fossett
Copyright (c) 2026 Douglas Fossett
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-292026-07-29102172510.62141/okh.v10i2.247Latinx’s Testimonies on the Margins of Street-Life
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/248
<p>This article examines two Latinx testimonies connected to street life in San Bernardino, CA, a Hispanic majority city in the Inland Empire. The city of San Bernardino has undergone high levels of urban decline, which in turn has created a web of urban issues, such as a rising unhoused population, high levels of urban violence and other issues of street life (drug usage, gangs, etc.) In the process, street ministries have emerged in the city and have attempted to assist people on the margins. In spaces like street ministries, non-traditional testimonies appear and remind us of narratives, which I term <em>testimonies on the margins</em>, that operate outside of more institutional spaces of religion. While traditional conversion narratives can have their own narrative arcs, what are we to make of testimonies of the street life that appear in pieces or fragments, and of women that transform their wounds to factors of healing? Exploring Latinx testimonies on the margins of San Bernardino as “fragmented testimonies” and “testimonies of tears,” this article reads these testimonies as overlooked accounts of how Latinx voices survive and heal from their social-historical conditions, compounded with issues of street life. It proposes that, while unorthodox, these testimonies are attempts to heal from wounds of street life—<em>wounds of erasure</em> and <em>wounds of loss</em>.</p>Christopher Valencia
Copyright (c) 2026 Christopher Valencia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-292026-07-29102264310.62141/okh.v10i2.248‘Will Not Those Who Have Ears, Hear?’
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/253
<p>This article analyzes the implications of the Weberian concept of a prophet through a theological lens. The analysis extends to the influence of the Holy Spirit on the Christian experience, offering insight into the fruits of the Spirit as the core of Christian ethics. With the Holy Spirit as the ‘ultimate prophet,’ and the fruits of the Spirit as the fuel for virtuous Christian behavior, the Weberian prophet is described in the form of one highly driven and authentic person, a pastor of a church located in a rural village of southern Ohio. This individual, seeking to actualize the will of God in their social context, exemplifies Max Weber’s idea of a charismatic leader, a sort of ethical prophet in contemporary culture. In offering an ethnographic account of transcendent communication and prophetic influence within the life of the church, I also considered how the Holy Spirit serves as an actor in His own right, motivating spiritual growth, emotional maturity, and prophetic dialogue among the body of believers.</p>Micah Adkins
Copyright (c) 2026 Micah Adkins
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-292026-07-29102445910.62141/okh.v10i2.253Faithfully Praying in the Same Direction–Together
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/254
<p>This article explores the development and impact of a profound interfaith friendship between an American Christian and an Indonesian Muslim, highlighting collaborative efforts to promote mutual understanding and respect amidst diverse religious backgrounds. The authors recount their individual journeys, their own cultural exchanges, and the challenges they have faced in bridging religious divides. By way of both academic analysis and personal reflections, the authors emphasize the importance of authentic, humble, listening religious dialogue, the limitations of secularism in accommodating deep religious convictions, and the transformative potential of interfaith solidarity and openness. The authors advocate for a conceptual shift from bounded to centered sets in religious identity, suggesting that genuine devotion and service to humanity do a better job of defining religious belonging. This approach aims to foster inclusivity without compromising individual faith tenets, offering a model for peaceful coexistence and cooperative action in pluralistic societies.</p>Lindy BackuesAchmad Munjid
Copyright (c) 2026 Lindy Backues, Achmad Munjid
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-292026-07-29102608110.62141/okh.v10i2.254On Defining “Religion” in “Religious” vs. “Secular” Engagement
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/255
Robert McKee
Copyright (c) 2026 Robert McKee
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-292026-07-29102829210.62141/okh.v10i2.255Recovering Pharisees
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/article/view/252
<p> </p>Gregory Stephens
Copyright (c) 2026 Gregory Stephens
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-292026-07-291029310410.62141/okh.v10i2.252